Aquaman

avatar
I think you have to distinguish these things separately. First of all, the FIGC motivation clearly states that the situation is "unregulated", so where is the law that proved Juve or other teams, for that matter, are guilty of. Secondly, the original case from more than a year ago, already acquitted Juve and many other teams which focused on determination of the player's prices. Third "closing an investigation for a matter of wrong timing" is NOT ridiculous and that only means that the prosecution team did not follow certain codes and rules in the proceedings. Truly a shame for the Italian public that incompetent people are in high places. And for the nth time, prices of players are agreed upon by two teams with the contracts being submitted to the Federation for final approval and registration. If anything this highlights problems with the upper body in not red flagging transfers right there and then.... Enough nonsense.
avatar
You could also argue that being able to incriminate them an not the rest of the clubs possibly involved in the same scandal simply because they are on the stock exchange is fairly ridiculous Or the fact that the sports justice department said they preferred to conduct a ‘speedy’ investigation as opposed to a ‘thorough’ one. Or the fact that the mp calling for the initial -9 has numerous times mentioned he hates Juventus. If the -15 stays I’ll accept it and it will be deserved, but I’d appreciate the process to be thorough and fair.
avatar
he might be him
avatar
He just won't
avatar
Chelsea sold this guy to buy Mudryk btw